Bücher Wenner
Olga Grjasnowa liest aus "JULI, AUGUST, SEPTEMBER
04.02.2025 um 19:30 Uhr
Does Privilege Prevail?
Litigation in High Courts Across the Globe
von Stacia L Haynie, Kirk A Randazzo, Reginald S Sheehan
Verlag: University of Virginia Press
Hardcover
ISBN: 978-0-8139-5111-9
Erschienen am 17.04.2024
Sprache: Englisch
Format: 229 mm [H] x 152 mm [B] x 10 mm [T]
Gewicht: 284 Gramm
Umfang: 190 Seiten

Preis: 42,30 €
keine Versandkosten (Inland)


Dieser Titel wird erst bei Bestellung gedruckt. Eintreffen bei uns daher ca. am 22. November.

Der Versand innerhalb der Stadt erfolgt in Regel am gleichen Tag.
Der Versand nach außerhalb dauert mit Post/DHL meistens 1-2 Tage.

klimaneutral
Der Verlag produziert nach eigener Angabe noch nicht klimaneutral bzw. kompensiert die CO2-Emissionen aus der Produktion nicht. Daher übernehmen wir diese Kompensation durch finanzielle Förderung entsprechender Projekte. Mehr Details finden Sie in unserer Klimabilanz.
Biografische Anmerkung
Klappentext

Stacia L. Haynie is President of Midwestern State University. Kirk A. Randazzo is Professor of Political Science at the University of South Carolina. Reginald S. Sheehan is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Michigan State University.



The first transnational comparative study of legal party capability theory Justice is supposed to be blind. Cynics will say they know better. But what do the facts say? This groundbreaking study provides objective, data-driven answers to long-standing questions about winners and losers in courtrooms across the world. Does the party with the greater resources, such as money and influence, always prevail--and if so, why? Does Privilege Prevail? is the first book to evaluate these questions using a multi-country approach and, in doing so, assess what legal professionals and political scientists call party capability theory. Stacia Haynie, Kirk Randazzo, and Reginald Sheehan analyze over fifteen thousand litigation outcomes of the high courts of six countries--Australia, Canada, India, the Philippines, South Africa, and the United Kingdom--from 1970 to 2000. This unprecedented trove of data reveals that while the "haves" of society do undoubtedly enjoy certain advantages in the judicial system, a more complex explanation for legal outcomes is required than party capability theory provides--especially when it comes to assessing the role of attorneys and their legal teams or the components of the docket where judges can provide avenues for the "have nots" to succeed.


andere Formate