List of Contributors

Acknowledgements

Guide to the Essays

1 What is Understanding? An Overview of Recent Debates in Epistemology and Philosophy of Science

Christoph Baumberger, Claus Beisbart and Georg Brun

Part I

Understanding and the Facts

2 How Idealization Provide Understanding

Michael Strevens

3 How False Theories can Yield Genuine Understanding

Henk W. de Regt and Victor Gijsbers

4 Exemplification in Understanding

Catherine Z. Elgin

5 Explaining Understanding, Understanding Knowledge

Sabine Ammon

6 Enlightening Falsehoods: A Model View of Scientific Understanding

Soazig Le Bihan

Part II

Understanding and its Norms

7 Must Understanding be Coherent?

Kareem Khalifa

8 Dimensions of Objectual Understanding

Christoph Baumberger and Georg Brun

9 An Evidentialist Account of Explanatory Understanding

Mark Newman

10 Understanding and Transparency

Stephen R. Grimm

11 Satisfying Understanding

John Greco

Part III

Understanding and the Epistemic Agent

12 Towards a Knowledge-Based Account of Understanding

Christoph Kelp

13 Cognitive Bias, Scepticism and Understanding

J. Adam Carter and Duncan Pritchard

14 Social Epistemology and the Acquisition of Understanding

Emma C. Gordon

15 Understanding without Believing

Daniel A. Wilkenfeld

Index

Stephen R. Grimm is Professor of Philosophy at Fordham University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame, his B.A. from Williams College, and he works mainly in epistemology, the philosophy of science, and ethics.

Christoph Baumberger is Senior Researcher at the Institute for Environmental Decisions at ETH Zurich. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Zurich, and he has published in epistemology, philosophy of science, aesthetics, and philosophy of architecture.　

Sabine Ammon works at the Berlin University of Technology as a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellow, funded by the European Union. She received her Ph.D. from Berlin University of Technology. She works mainly in epistemology, philosophy of engineering sciences and technology, image theory, and design ethics.

What does it mean to understand something? What types of understanding can be distinguished? Is understanding always provided by explanations? And how is it related to knowledge? Such questions have attracted considerable interest in epistemology recently. These discussions, however, have not yet engaged insights about explanations and theories developed in philosophy of science. Conversely, philosophers of science have debated the nature of explanations and theories, while dismissing understanding as a psychological by-product.
In this book, epistemologists and philosophers of science together address basic questions about the nature of understanding, providing a new overview of the field.¿ False theories, cognitive bias, transparency, coherency, and other important issues are discussed. Its 15 original chapters are essential reading for researchers and graduate students interested in the current debates about understanding.