Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives will be of great interest to researchers in political philosophy, applied and social epistemology, ethics and feminist philosophy, as well as those working in politics, and sociology.

Alessandra Tanesini is Professor of Philosophy at Cardiff University, UK.

Michael P. Lynch is Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut, USA.

Introduction Alessandra Tanesini and Michael P. Lynch Part I: Argumentation, bias and arrogance 1. Reassessing different conceptions of argumentation Catarina Dutilh Novaes 2. Martial metaphors and argumentative virtues and vices Ian James Kidd 3. Arrogance and deep disagreement Andrew Aberdein 4. Closed-mindedness and arrogance Heather Battaly Part II: Trust, dogmatism and arrogance in social contexts 5. Intellectual trust and the marketplace of ideas Allan Hazlett 6. Is searching the internet making us intellectually arrogant? J. Adam Carter and Emma C. Gordon 7. Intellectual humility and the curse of knowledge Michael Hannon 8. Bullshit and dogmatism: A discourse analytical perspective Chris Heffer Part III: Polarisation 9. Polarisation and the problem of spreading arrogance Michael P. Lynch 10. Arrogance, polarisation and arguing to win Alessandra Tanesini 11. Partisanship, humility, and epistemic polarisation Thomas Nadelhoffer, Rose Graves, Gus Skorburg, Mark Leary, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong 12. Science denial, polarisation, and arrogance Lee McIntyre 13. The polarisation toolkit Quassim Cassam 14. Epistemic rights in a polarised world: the right to know and the abortion debate Lani Watson. Index