This book describes the constitutions of six major federations and how they have been interpreted by their highest courts, compares the interpretive methods that have guided the courts, and explores the reasons for major differences between these methods. Each of the six federations is the subject of a separate chapter written by a leading authority, which describes not only the interpretive methodology currently used, but the evolution of that methodology since the constitution in question was first enacted. The book also includes a concluding chapter that compares these methodologies, and attempts to explain variations by reference to different social, historical, institutional and political circumstances.

Jeffrey Goldsworthy holds a Personal Chair at Monash University. His major interests are legal philosophy, and constitutional law, theory, and history. He has numerous publications in these fields, and is best known for his book "The Sovereignty of Parliament, History and Philosophy" (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1999), and many journal articles on constitutional interpretation.

• 1: Introduction


• 2: Mark Tushnet: United States: Eclecticism In the Service of Pragmatism


• 3: Peter Hogg: Canada: From Privy Council to Supreme Court


• 4: Jeffrey Goldsworthy: Australia: Devotion to Legalism


• 5: Donald Kommers: Germany: Balancing Rights and Duties


• 6: S.P. Sathe: India: From Positivism to Structuralism


• 7: Heinz Klug: South Africa: From Constitutional Promise to Social Transformation


• 8: Conclusions


• Index